Re: [PATCH] -mm/linux-next: procfs: Mark thread stack correctly in proc/<pid>/maps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Siddhesh,

On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:32:35 +0530 Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh.poyarekar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Paul Gortmaker
> <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Now it is:
> >
> > mm/nommu.o: In function `vm_is_stack':
> > nommu.c:(.text+0x2178): multiple definition of `vm_is_stack'
> > mm/util.o:util.c:(.text+0x2bc): first defined here
> > make[2]: *** [mm/built-in.o] Error 1
> >
> > http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/5941188/
> 
> Looks like the problem is because this patch got included in
> linux-next 2 days ago:
> 
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git;a=commitdiff;h=47d1ab583408e5b8e900c5080aec9bbcf210df22

I will remove that patch today.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Attachment: pgpNECazZo0X5.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux