On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh.poyarekar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Andrew Morton > <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 23:04:36 +0530 >> Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh.poyarekar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Following is the updated patch with requested changes incorporated. >> >> Boy, that's a lot of changes (below). What does it all do? >> > > Hi, > > Since this patch was included in the -mm tree on March 14th, I assumed > that linux-next would get the patch in today's merge, but it hasn't. > Is there something I am missing? Does the patch need additional > review/acks that I need to request for? Hi Siddhesh, It looks like this still fails. The original failure was: super.c:(.text+0x3ffd8): undefined reference to `vm_is_stack' Now it is: mm/nommu.o: In function `vm_is_stack': nommu.c:(.text+0x2178): multiple definition of `vm_is_stack' mm/util.o:util.c:(.text+0x2bc): first defined here make[2]: *** [mm/built-in.o] Error 1 http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/5941188/ Can you include in your testing for v3, the ARM at91x40_defconfig please? Thanks, Paul. > > Thanks, > Siddhesh > > Thanks, > Siddhesh > > > -- > Siddhesh Poyarekar > http://siddhesh.in > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
