Around Thu 22 Mar 2012 15:04:31 +0100 or thereabout, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > On 03/22/2012 01:33 PM, Hans-Christian Egtvedt : >> Around Thu 22 Mar 2012 01:18:40 -0400 or thereabout, Paul Gortmaker wrote: <snipp Atmel NAND cleanup> >>>> Yes, we need to fix this. But I would not like to see this >>>> "platform_data/atmel.h" renamed: I think that this file was designed to >>>> collect several common platform data (ie: not just NAND related). >>>> >>>> So maybe we should just rename the entry that exists in >>>> mach-at32ap/include/mach/board.h >>>> and remove all occurrences of platform_data/atmel_nand.h >>> >>> Funny, since this is what I did 1st before I re-read the original commit >>> log in more detail. :) Oh well. Here is the alternate solution. You >>> guys can pick whichever one you like best. I compile tested this one >>> as well. >> >> I'll leave it to Nicolas to sign-off on this, but the changes look fine for >> me. > > Ok, which way do you want to follow for inclusion in mainline? I take it > through arm-soc? I have not gotten my key signed by any kernel developers yet, so typically I've asked people to take it through Andrew's tree. <snipp> -- HcE -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
