On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Hugh, > > On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:23:26 -0700 (PDT) Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Thu, 15 Mar 2012, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> > >> > So this needs to go into Rob's tree. Maybe after Hugh verifies that it >> > fixes his problem. >> >> Yes, Daniel got me to try it offline before he posted it. >> >> Tested-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Excellent. > >> Personally, I'd recommend including it even before it gets into Rob's >> tree (where it may well be improved upon first): it does a lot to >> improve the usability of linux-next. > > OK, so I will add this patch to today's tree (on the assumption that it, > or something better, will be added to Rob's tree soon). Stephen, A slight glitch: Rob is away until Tuesday. Should Daniel create a new branch to carry this? /Amit -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
