On Thu, 15 Mar 2012, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 01:09:41 +0100 Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > The cpuidle consolidation inverts the local_irq_enable for > > the poll_idle function with CPU_RELAX. > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Reported-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> > > So this needs to go into Rob's tree. Maybe after Hugh verifies that it > fixes his problem. Yes, Daniel got me to try it offline before he posted it. Tested-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> Personally, I'd recommend including it even before it gets into Rob's tree (where it may well be improved upon first): it does a lot to improve the usability of linux-next. Hugh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
