Hi, On Friday, March 09, 2012, MyungJoo Ham wrote: > On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 6:36 PM, MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > 2012/3/7 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>: [...] > Hi Rafael, > > > Here goes to-be-pulled branches for linux-pm.git of yours (pm-devfreq, > pm-qos); they have some updates since last submissions (like those > mentioned by Mike) > Please use the following addresses if you feel fine for them to be pulled. > > > Cheers! > MyungJoo. > > -------- PM / devfreq (fitted for pm-devfreq branch) ---------- > The following changes since commit e4c9d8efe6bdc844071d68960dfa2003c5cf6449: > > Merge branch 'devfreq-for-next' of > git://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-samsung into pm-devfreq > (2012-01-25 00:02:08 +0100) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-samsung devfreq-for-next > > GITWEB: http://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-samsung/shortlog/refs/heads/devfreq-for-next > > MyungJoo Ham (2): > PM / devfreq: add PM QoS support > PM / devfreq: add relation of recommended frequency. This patch I'm fine whith and I can either take it as a standalone patch or pull it from your tree if you put it into a separate branch for me. The previous one, however, I'm not entirely comfortable with and I'd like to discuss it in more detail. Can you please post it for discussion? > drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c | 193 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > drivers/devfreq/exynos4_bus.c | 14 ++- > include/linux/devfreq.h | 53 +++++++++++- > 3 files changed, 245 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > > > -------- PM / QoS (fitted for pm-qos branch) ---------- > The following changes since commit a9b542ee607a8afafa9447292394959fc84ea650: > > PM / QoS: unconditionally build the feature (2012-02-13 16:23:42 +0100) > > are available in the git repository at: > git://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-samsung pm_qos-for-next > > GITWEB: http://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-samsung/shortlog/refs/heads/pm_qos-for-next > > MyungJoo Ham (2): > PM / QoS: Introduce new classes: DMA-Throughput and DVFS-Latency > PM / QoS: add pm_qos_update_request_timeout API I'd prefer all discussions to settle down before pulling these two. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
