On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Ashish Jangam <Ashish.Jangam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > From: glikely@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:glikely@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Grant Likely > Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 11:55 PM > To: Ashish Jangam > Cc: Stephen Rothwell; linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Mark Brown; Dajun > Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the regmap tree > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Ashish Jangam > <ashish.jangam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Fixes DA9052 GPIO errors. >> >> This patch is functionally tested on Samsung SMDKV6410. >> >> Signed-off-by: David Dajun Chen <dchen@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Ashish Jangam <ashish.jangam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/gpio/gpio-da9052.c | 37 ++++-------------------------- >> include/linux/mfd/da9052/gpio.h | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > gpio-da9052.c is the only users of mfd/da9052/gpio.h. Why is this > include file needed? The #defines can simply stay in the .c file. > I've picked up the patch, but modified it to keep the header defines > in the .c file. If there is a reason this won't work, then please let > me know. > > This header file is shared between GPIO and LED module. I have already > posted this LED long back got ACK but did not got merged due to its > dependency on MFD module. Are the LEDs attached to GPIOs? If so, then is there a reason that the leds-gpio driver can't be used? g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
