On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:08:51AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:16:31 +0100 Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > cgroups: new cancel_attach_task() subsystem callback > > > cgroups: ability to stop res charge propagation on bounded ancestor > > > cgroups: add res counter common ancestor searching > > > res_counter: allow charge failure pointer to be null > > > cgroups: pull up res counter charge failure interpretation to caller > > > cgroups: allow subsystems to cancel a fork > > > cgroups: add a task counter subsystem > > > cgroups: ERR_PTR needs err.h > > > cgroup: Fix task counter common ancestor logic > > > cgroup-fix-task-counter-common-ancestor-logic-checkpatch-fixes > > > > > > I am wondering if that patch set should be included in the cgroup tree? > > > > That would be probably the easier solution. > > Andrew, do you mind if I rebase these patches and target them to Tejun's > > tree instead? > > Sure, that works, I'll drop them. Cool. > > We can keep them on a standalone branch there based on Tejuns until > > we reach an agreement on their upstreamability. > > I wondered what had been happening with that discussion. I guess we > need to restart it. > Dan J Walsh and Daniel Berrange who work on lxc and for whom I'm primarily working on this feature have added their point of view. You might want to have a look. I can post something that synthetize everybody's words. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
