On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:16:31 +0100 Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > cgroups: new cancel_attach_task() subsystem callback > > cgroups: ability to stop res charge propagation on bounded ancestor > > cgroups: add res counter common ancestor searching > > res_counter: allow charge failure pointer to be null > > cgroups: pull up res counter charge failure interpretation to caller > > cgroups: allow subsystems to cancel a fork > > cgroups: add a task counter subsystem > > cgroups: ERR_PTR needs err.h > > cgroup: Fix task counter common ancestor logic > > cgroup-fix-task-counter-common-ancestor-logic-checkpatch-fixes > > > > I am wondering if that patch set should be included in the cgroup tree? > > That would be probably the easier solution. > Andrew, do you mind if I rebase these patches and target them to Tejun's > tree instead? Sure, that works, I'll drop them. > We can keep them on a standalone branch there based on Tejuns until > we reach an agreement on their upstreamability. I wondered what had been happening with that discussion. I guess we need to restart it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
