On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 03:16:26AM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> PPC32/64 defines NO_IRQ to zero, so no problems expected.
> ARM defines NO_IRQ to -1, but OF code relies on IRQ domains support,
> which returns correct ('0') value in 'no irq' case. So everything
> should be fine.
>
> Other arches might break if some of their OF drivers rely on NO_IRQ
> being not 0. If so, the drivers must be fixed, finally.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
/me likes NO_IRQ removal very much
Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
