On 11/10/2011 09:25 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > PPC32/64 defines NO_IRQ to zero, so no problems expected. > ARM defines NO_IRQ to -1, but OF code relies on IRQ domains support, > which returns correct ('0') value in 'no irq' case. So everything > should be fine. > > Other arches might break if some of their OF drivers rely on NO_IRQ > being not 0. If so, the drivers must be fixed, finally. > > Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/of/irq.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++------------ > 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/of/irq.c b/drivers/of/irq.c > index 6d3dd39..2dd4937 100644 > --- a/drivers/of/irq.c > +++ b/drivers/of/irq.c > @@ -26,11 +26,6 @@ > #include <linux/string.h> > #include <linux/slab.h> > > -/* For archs that don't support NO_IRQ (such as x86), provide a dummy value */ > -#ifndef NO_IRQ > -#define NO_IRQ 0 > -#endif > - > /** > * irq_of_parse_and_map - Parse and map an interrupt into linux virq space > * @device: Device node of the device whose interrupt is to be mapped > @@ -42,12 +37,23 @@ > unsigned int irq_of_parse_and_map(struct device_node *dev, int index) > { > struct of_irq oirq; > + int ret = 0; > > if (of_irq_map_one(dev, index, &oirq)) > - return NO_IRQ; > - > - return irq_create_of_mapping(oirq.controller, oirq.specifier, > - oirq.size); > + goto no_irq; > + > + ret = irq_create_of_mapping(oirq.controller, oirq.specifier, > + oirq.size); > +no_irq: > +#ifdef NO_IRQ > +#if NO_IRQ != 0 > + if (ret == NO_IRQ) > + pr_warn("Hit NO_IRQ case for your arch. Drivers might expect " > + "NO_IRQ, but we return 0. If anything breaks, driver " > + "have to be fixed.\n"); > +#endif > +#endif This warning code is really ugly. Can we just drop it? In my searching of in kernel dts files, there's only 1 instance I have found (Versatile AB watchdog) that would hit this. If not, you don't need to handle irq_create_of_mapping return as that is already always 0 for no irq or error. Otherwise, looks fine. Rob > + return ret; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_of_parse_and_map); > > @@ -345,7 +351,7 @@ int of_irq_to_resource(struct device_node *dev, int index, struct resource *r) > > /* Only dereference the resource if both the > * resource and the irq are valid. */ > - if (r && irq != NO_IRQ) { > + if (r && irq) { > r->start = r->end = irq; > r->flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ; > r->name = dev->full_name; > @@ -363,7 +369,7 @@ int of_irq_count(struct device_node *dev) > { > int nr = 0; > > - while (of_irq_to_resource(dev, nr, NULL) != NO_IRQ) > + while (of_irq_to_resource(dev, nr, NULL)) > nr++; > > return nr; > @@ -383,7 +389,7 @@ int of_irq_to_resource_table(struct device_node *dev, struct resource *res, > int i; > > for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++, res++) > - if (of_irq_to_resource(dev, i, res) == NO_IRQ) > + if (!of_irq_to_resource(dev, i, res)) > break; > > return i; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html