On 18:53 Tue 29 Nov , David Miller wrote: > From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 22:21:14 +0100 > > > Use the generic gpiolib gpio_is_valid() function to test > > if the phy IRQ line GPIO is actually provided. > > > > For non-connected or non-existing phy IRQ lines, -EINVAL > > value is used for phy_irq_pin field of struct at91_eth_data. > > > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx> > > I'm assuming this goes through the ARM tree, because in both of my networking > trees there is no ARM at91 implementation of gpio_is_valid(). yes the depending patch series is in the arm-soc can we have your ack or sob? Best Regards, J. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
