From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 05:44:03 +0100 > On 18:53 Tue 29 Nov , David Miller wrote: >> From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx> >> Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 22:21:14 +0100 >> >> > Use the generic gpiolib gpio_is_valid() function to test >> > if the phy IRQ line GPIO is actually provided. >> > >> > For non-connected or non-existing phy IRQ lines, -EINVAL >> > value is used for phy_irq_pin field of struct at91_eth_data. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> I'm assuming this goes through the ARM tree, because in both of my networking >> trees there is no ARM at91 implementation of gpio_is_valid(). > yes the depending patch series is in the arm-soc > > can we have your ack or sob? Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
