On 2011-10-25 15:10, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> *Note well* >>> >>> This tree has nate had any build testing at all. As such, it probably >>> doesn't build :-) This tree is really just a roll up of the current state >>> of the trees when the v3.2 merge window opened. It will not be put into >>> the build system referred to below. >>> >> >> I have generated a single linux-next (next-20111025) patch on top of >> v3.1, it's approx. 100M! >> >> $ du -h patch-v3.1-next-20111025.patch >> 96M patch-v3.1-next-20111025.patch >> >> I noticed this build-failure: >> >> CC block/blk-throttle.o >> CC [M] fs/fuse/dir.o >> /mnt/sdb3/linux-kernel/linux-3.1/debian/build/source_i386_none/block/blk-throttle.c: >> In function 'blk_throtl_drain': >> /mnt/sdb3/linux-kernel/linux-3.1/debian/build/source_i386_none/block/blk-throttle.c:1221:2: >> error: implicit declaration of function 'lockdep_is_held' >> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] >> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors >> >> make[5]: *** [block/blk-throttle.o] Error 1 >> make[4]: *** [block] Error 2 >> >> This happens with Debian's gcc-4.6 (4.6.1-16) and default >> KBUILD_ENABLE_EXTRA_GCC_CHECKS value. >> >> - Sedat - >> > > Looks like "#include <linux/lockdep.h>" is missing in block/blk-throttle.c? Hmm, I wonder why it isn't triggering for cfq-iosched.o or elevator.o as well. Is blk-throttle modular? What is your .config? -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
