On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> *Note well* >> >> This tree has nate had any build testing at all. As such, it probably >> doesn't build :-) This tree is really just a roll up of the current state >> of the trees when the v3.2 merge window opened. It will not be put into >> the build system referred to below. >> > > I have generated a single linux-next (next-20111025) patch on top of > v3.1, it's approx. 100M! > > $ du -h patch-v3.1-next-20111025.patch > 96M patch-v3.1-next-20111025.patch > > I noticed this build-failure: > > CC block/blk-throttle.o > CC [M] fs/fuse/dir.o > /mnt/sdb3/linux-kernel/linux-3.1/debian/build/source_i386_none/block/blk-throttle.c: > In function 'blk_throtl_drain': > /mnt/sdb3/linux-kernel/linux-3.1/debian/build/source_i386_none/block/blk-throttle.c:1221:2: > error: implicit declaration of function 'lockdep_is_held' > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > > make[5]: *** [block/blk-throttle.o] Error 1 > make[4]: *** [block] Error 2 > > This happens with Debian's gcc-4.6 (4.6.1-16) and default > KBUILD_ENABLE_EXTRA_GCC_CHECKS value. > > - Sedat - > Looks like "#include <linux/lockdep.h>" is missing in block/blk-throttle.c? - Sedat - -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
