> > This breaks Medfield so NAK > > > > The correct behaviour should be > > > > INTEL_MID defined -> mrst_cpu_chip has meaning > > INTEL_MID not defined -> mrst_identify_chip is 0 > > > > your change makes it 0 for Medfield which means it will crash on boot. > > Randy's patch is an attempt to fix Mathias's "x86: rtc: don't register > a platform RTC device for Intel MID platforms". NAK this. > I'm tempted to do a mass droppage, but then some of the patches might > get forever lost. Randy's patch breaks Medfield, simply because he's seeing an incomplete set of merges. The stuff the x86 maintainers were sent already deals with this. It's all simply a case of waiting for the trees to get back into sync, at which point platform/x86/mrst will get built for INTEL_MID general case. > Could we please get some x86 maintainers on deck?? Well currently x86@xxxxxxxxxx is undeliverable so that won't help you. Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
