On 09/13/2011 05:32 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Jeremy, > > On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:53:39 -0700 Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On 09/13/2011 08:07 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >>> On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>>> >>>> On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:54:41 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 16:12:33 -0700 "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> On 08/25/2011 04:06 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>>>>>>> Stephen: the x86/spinlocks branch in the -tip tree is obsolete and >>>>>>>> should be dropped. >>>>>>> That's a bit tricky as I get a rolled up tip tree. The best I could do >>>>>>> is revert the commit that merges the x86/spinlocks branch into >>>>>>> auto-latest ... I'll do that for today (unless something happens to the >>>>>>> tip tree in the next hour). >>>>>>> >>>>>> OK, let me bother Ingo about it. >>>>> For today, I have done "git revert -m 1 6f8fa39c81f1" after merging the >>>>> tip tree. >>>> I am still doing this in each linux-next, and it doesn't appear to have >>>> been fixed up the the tree on tesla.tglx.de, yet, I think. >>> We'll take it out. >> >> Actually, the tip x86/spinlocks was the most up-to-date version of those >> patches (since hpa had rebased them to a more recent version of mainline). >> >> But never mind. Stephen, could you use >> >> git://github.com/jsgf/linux-xen.git upstream/xen >> >> for linux-next instead of the kernel.org xen.git, and I've re-added the >> up-to-date spinlock changes there. > > OK, I have switched to this from today. > > My understanding is this: I do *not* need to revert the spinlock changes > from tip anymore, correct? Right. tglx has removed these changes from tip.git (even though they were OK), and I've reinstated the proper versions in my tree. The xen.git on git.kernel.org still has old versions, but I'll sort that out once it's back online. I expect it will ultimately go upstream via tip.git, but we can work that out later too. Thanks, J -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html