On 09/13/2011 08:07 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:54:41 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 16:12:33 -0700 "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On 08/25/2011 04:06 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>>>> Stephen: the x86/spinlocks branch in the -tip tree is obsolete and
>>>>>> should be dropped.
>>>>> That's a bit tricky as I get a rolled up tip tree. The best I could do
>>>>> is revert the commit that merges the x86/spinlocks branch into
>>>>> auto-latest ... I'll do that for today (unless something happens to the
>>>>> tip tree in the next hour).
>>>>>
>>>> OK, let me bother Ingo about it.
>>> For today, I have done "git revert -m 1 6f8fa39c81f1" after merging the
>>> tip tree.
>> I am still doing this in each linux-next, and it doesn't appear to have
>> been fixed up the the tree on tesla.tglx.de, yet, I think.
> We'll take it out.
Actually, the tip x86/spinlocks was the most up-to-date version of those
patches (since hpa had rebased them to a more recent version of mainline).
But never mind. Stephen, could you use
git://github.com/jsgf/linux-xen.git upstream/xen
for linux-next instead of the kernel.org xen.git, and I've re-added the
up-to-date spinlock changes there.
Thanks,
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
