On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 09:06:47PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:07:16PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > > > On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 18:34:00 -0700 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > there doesn't seem to be 'rcu/next' branch, right? > > > > > > No, there is not. So the idea is to push "rcu/next" the first time, > > > then ":rcu/next" thereafter? > > > > Can't you just do a (forced) push over and over again without removing > > the branch each time? > > I will give it a try on the next update. ;-) OK, I pushed a small update to one of the commits, this time to branch rcu/next, again at https://github.com/paulmckrcu/linux. I guess that the acid test is the next time I update. ;-) Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
