On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 22:21:16 -0400 Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 20:32 -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 2:06 AM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 08:39:02 -0400 Mimi Zohar wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 22:10 -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > >> >>> > Hi, > >> >>> > > >> >>> > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >>> > > I think that you are going to need to do something like Arnaud suggested > >> >>> > > and use "depends on TCG_TPM=y" instead of just "depends on TCG_TPM", > >> >>> > > unless you can convince someone that this is a kconfig bug. > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > dammit... I guess there is... > >> >>> > > >> >>> > If you consider the following Kconfig: [snip] > >> >>> > I would have expected CONFIG_C and CONFIG_C0 to be 'y', just as 'E'. > >> >>> > If you remove D's dependency on 'A', everything works as expected. So > >> >>> > it would seem direct dependency state influence the state of reverse > >> >>> > dependencies... > >> >>> > > >> >>> > Will have a look... > >> >>> > > >> >>> > - Arnaud > >> >>> > >> >>> Thanks for looking into this! Instead of changing 'TCG_TPM' to > >> >>> 'TCG_TPM=y', the dependency should be on 'TRUSTED_KEYS=y'. Then when > >> >>> I've refactored ENCRYPTED_KEYS, removing the ENCRYPTED_KEYS dependency > >> >>> on TRUSTED_KEYS, the EVM dependency would be '(TRUSTED_KEYS=y || > >> >>> TRUSTED_KEYS=n)'. Do you want a temporary fix for now? > >> >> > >> >> Yes, linux-next (randconfig) builds are still failing, so we need something > >> >> to prevent that. > >> >> > >> > you may want to try: > >> > > >> > git://github.com/lacombar/linux-2.6.git master/kconfig/expr-woes > >> > > >> ping ? > >> > >> - Arnaud > > > > I assume you want me to test using expr-woes, but I'm not how. Could > > you help me here a bit. > > > > (Over the weekend I removed encrypted keys dependency on TCG_TPM.) > > > Well, at this point, this is not really related to the particular > issue, but to kconfig more generally. I guess I'll just post the > patches on LKML and see if they triggers non-wanted regression. Yes, please do that. > Thanks, > - Arnaud > > > thanks, > > > > Mimi > > > >> > only the last commit is relevant to the problem, but depend on one > >> > another to get <assert.h>. The rest aims at tidying the expr stuff. > >> > I'm looking for regression it may have introduced. > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > - Arnaud > >> > > >> > ps: I'll most likely be AFK until sunday evening (to be conservative). --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
