On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 17:08 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 16:44 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >> > I have tried with solution #2 as it partially restores old behaviour
> >> > (patch is attached).
> > Partially? Please explain.
> -#define vdbg_printk(a_dbg_level, format, arg...) \
> - do { } while (0)
> +#define vdbg_printk(a_dbg_level, format, arg...) \
> + no_printk(format, ##arg)
I understand the reversed patch.
My point was focused on the word "partially".
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
