On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Matthew Garrett <mjg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 05:49:29AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
>
>> It's vdbg_printk no_printk verification.
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_THINKPAD_ACPI_DEBUG
>> #define vdbg_printk dbg_printk
>> static const char *str_supported(int is_supported);
>> #else
>> #define vdbg_printk(a_dbg_level, format, arg...) Â Â Â\
>> Â Â Â no_printk(format, ##arg)
>> #endif
>>
>> Two ways to handle this.
>>
>> 1: add
>> static inline const char *str_supported(int is_supported) { return ""; }
>> to the #else
>>
>> 2: Remove no_printk verification and return it to do {} while (0)
>>
>> Do you have a preference?
>
> I don't. Henrique?
>
> --
> Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
I have tried with solution #2 as it partially restores old behaviour
(patch is attached).
- Sedat -
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
index d8f3e65..983e42f 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
@@ -391,7 +391,7 @@ do { \
static const char *str_supported(int is_supported);
#else
#define vdbg_printk(a_dbg_level, format, arg...) \
- no_printk(format, ##arg)
+ do { } while (0)
#endif
static void tpacpi_log_usertask(const char * const what)
