On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 21:22:26 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Jean, > > On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 10:32:28 +0100 Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Stephen, sorry for the inconvenience, both Hans and myself build-tested > > the new code on an architecture where <linux/delay.h> gets included > > implicitly, so we didn't notice it was missing. > > It happens. It seems that delay.h is almost always the one that is > forgotten. X86 builds include it implicitly but powerpc doesn't. > > I wonder if we could concoct a nice checkpatch test for it. Would certainly be a good idea, yes. Probably not trivial though. -- Jean Delvare -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
