Hi Jean, On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 10:32:28 +0100 Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Stephen, sorry for the inconvenience, both Hans and myself build-tested > the new code on an architecture where <linux/delay.h> gets included > implicitly, so we didn't notice it was missing. It happens. It seems that delay.h is almost always the one that is forgotten. X86 builds include it implicitly but powerpc doesn't. I wonder if we could concoct a nice checkpatch test for it. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgphXvRiwXbfl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
