Dave Jones wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 01:35:42PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Dave,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the cpufreq tree got a conflict in
> > arch/arm/mach-exynos4/cpufreq.c between commit 7d30e8b3815f ("ARM:
> > EXYNOS4: Add EXYNOS4 CPU initialization support") from the s5p tree and
> > commit 44033b9c940e ([CPUFREQ] Remove the pm_message_t argument from
> > driver suspend"") from the cpufreq tree (where this file is called
> > arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/cpufreq.c).
> >
> > Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix
as
> > necessary.
>
> Yep, Looks fine to me. thanks.
>
> Dave
Of course, it's ok to me too.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
