Hi Dave,
Today's linux-next merge of the cpufreq tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-exynos4/cpufreq.c between commit 7d30e8b3815f ("ARM:
EXYNOS4: Add EXYNOS4 CPU initialization support") from the s5p tree and
commit 44033b9c940e ([CPUFREQ] Remove the pm_message_t argument from
driver suspend"") from the cpufreq tree (where this file is called
arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/cpufreq.c).
Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
diff --cc arch/arm/mach-exynos4/cpufreq.c
index a16ac35,7c08ad7..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/cpufreq.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/cpufreq.c
@@@ -452,8 -458,7 +452,7 @@@ static int exynos4_target(struct cpufre
}
#ifdef CONFIG_PM
- static int exynos4_cpufreq_suspend(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
- pm_message_t pmsg)
-static int s5pv310_cpufreq_suspend(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
++static int exynos4_cpufreq_suspend(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
return 0;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
