On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:11:50AM +0530, K, Narendra wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:58:48AM +0530, K, Narendra wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 02:39:49AM +0530, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi Narendra, > > > > > > On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 20:52:42 +0530 <Narendra_K@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > This patch addresses the build failure described in this thread by > > > > compiling fs/nls/nls_base.c always into vmlinux, thus making the base > > > > nls functions available always. > > > > > > Even on platforms that don't support ACPI or DMI ... > > > > > > You should really restrict this to CONFIG_ACPI || CONFIG_DMI || > > > CONFIG_NLS ... maybe create a CONFIG_NLS_BASE that is selected by ACPI, > > > DMI and NLS? > > > > Hi Stephen, > > > > Thank you for the suggestions. > > > > I agree with your suggestion that we should compile nls_base.o > > conditionally, only when ACPI || DMI || NLS. I have introduced a bew > > config option CONFIG_NLS_BASE and made ACPI, DMI and NLS select it. > > > > V1 -> V2: > > > > 1. Conditionally compile fs/nls/nls_base.c by introducing a new config > > option CONFIG_NLS_BASE, which is selected by (ACPI || DMI || NLS). > > Behavior of the rest of the files under fs/nls is not changed. > > > > From: Narendra K <narendra_k@xxxxxxxx> > > Subject: [PATCH V2] Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig > > Hi, > > Please let me know if there are any concerns with Version 2 of the patch. > If it looks good please consider it for inclusion. Hi Jesse, Please let me know if there are any concerns with this patch. If it is acceptable, please consider this for inclusion. With regards, Narendra K -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
