Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (net tree related)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 8:44 PM, John W. Linville
<linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 08:38:50PM +0200, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 8:25 PM, John W. Linville
>> <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> BTW, if this fuglet going to work if the driver is built modular?
>> >>
>> >> The idea of this things seems to be to allow arch platform code to call
>> >> into it to set things.  Such calls from arch platform code are going
>> >> to be "obj-y"
>> >>
>> >> So if this is built into the modular driver, I can't see how it
>> >> can work.
>> >
>> > Dave is right -- these Kconfig dependencies (or lack thereof) seem
>> > to be wrong.
>>
>> This is why I had to put it in drivers/net/wireless/Makefile (in both
>> the original patch and in the fix I sent earlier) and not in
>> drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/Makefile (as it was in the fix that Dave
>> was referring to).
>>
>> This way it works with a modular driver.
>
> That doesn't seem very helpful if someone selects
>
> CONFIG_MACH_OMAP_ZOOM2=y
> CONFIG_WL12XX_PLATFORM_DATA=n
>

CONFIG_WL12XX_PLATFORM_DATA is selected automatically if the relevant
driver is selected (this is independent of the underlying arch/board):

config WL12XX_PLATFORM_DATA
        bool
        depends on WL1271_SDIO != n
        default y

All we have to make sure is that it will be compiled built-in. If we
use drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/Makefile, and we build a modular
wl1271_sdio, it won't (despite it being selected as y).

That's why I put it in drivers/net/wireless/Makefile.

In the original patch I put the code itself in
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx to make it look nicer, but as Stephen
reported that seem to break building with a separate object folder...

So the fix I sent just moves that builtin code to
drivers/net/wireless. This maintains the builtin property even if the
driver is modular, and fixes the issue reported by Stephen.

Please tell me if you have any thoughts/suggestions.

Thanks,
Ohad.

> or am I missing something?
>
> John
> --
> John W. Linville                Someday the world will need a hero, and you
> linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx                  might be all we have.  Be ready.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux