On (Thu) Sep 16 2010 [10:20:01], Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 16 September 2010 08:54:39 Amit Shah wrote: > > Arnd, the device is supposed to be non-seekable so I'll add a > > nonseekable_open() to the open() call. > > > > So I guess the llseek operation should ne no_llseek instead of > > noop_llseek. Will you change that in your patchset? Should I do that > > in the patch I'll queue up? > > Yes, I think it's best if you just do both changes in your patch, I'll > drop this file from my series then. Great, I'll queue that up. Amit -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
