On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 09:45:13 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Andrew, Al, > > On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 15:20:42 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Bug is still there. Reverting ""Make ->drop_inode() just return > > whether inode needs to be dropped" makes it go away. > > > > Al, please don't just dump crap in linux-next and then ignore bug reports. > > People are trying to get work done here. > > I will revert that commit in linux-next today if it is still there (and > not fixed). Reverting the patch didn't help - the patch moved the BUG_ON() from generic_delete_inode() into __iput_final(). With the patch reverted the kernel still goes BUG over the same test in generic_delete_inode(). It could be that the bug was caused by fs-writeback.c changes. David, do you have time to take a look at this? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
