On Wed, 26 May 2010, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > If my suggestion above works, then one could start transforming current uses of __BYTE_ORDER, > into similar constructs and once all are done, #define both __LITTLE_ENDIAN/__BIG_ENDIAN and > move back to #if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN No. Don't do it. Why the hell would we want to use the inferior model? Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
