On Wed, 26 May 2010 08:29:45 +0200 Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 2010/05/26 06:09:00: > > > > Hi Andrew, > > > > On Tue, 25 May 2010 18:20:40 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > hmpf. Does this fix? > > > > No. > > > > The problem is that __LITTLE_ENDIAN is only defined in > > linux/byteorder/little_endian.h which is only included by little endian > > architectures ... > > Ah, not sure how to fix this ATM. Perhaps best to revert > crc32: use __BYTE_ORDER macro for endian detection > for now. yup. > I suspect fixing this entails moving all endian tests to #if __BYTE_ORDER ... > and then always define both __LITTLE_ENDIAN and __BIG_ENDIAN Yes we can't define __LITTLE_ENDIAN to anything on big-endian without breaking lots of other things. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
