On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 15:29, Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2010/2/25 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 02:38, Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> 2010/2/25 Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>: >>>> On Tue 23-02-10 23:11:13, Akinobu Mita wrote: >>>>> Use ext2_find_next_bit (generic_find_next_le_bit) to find the set bit >>>>> in little endian bitmap region. >> >> Is any of this in linux-next now? >> >> http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/2208481/ >> | fs/udf/balloc.c:274: error: implicit declaration of function >> 'generic_find_next_le_bit' > > Yep, Jan's patch caused the build breakage. > > Because generic_find_next_le_bit() is not available for all > archtectures. So we should use ext2_find_next_bit() here. Most architectures use the definitions in asm-generic, so they're OK. M68k doesn't. S390 is also affected, and I think arm as well (but there's no arm all-modconfig build in linux-next, so I'm not 100% sure). I'm cooking a patch... Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
