Re: [PATCH] udf: use ext2_find_next_bit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2010/2/25 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 02:38, Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 2010/2/25 Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>:
>>> On Tue 23-02-10 23:11:13, Akinobu Mita wrote:
>>>> Use ext2_find_next_bit (generic_find_next_le_bit) to find the set bit
>>>> in little endian bitmap region.
>
> Is any of this in linux-next now?
>
> http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/2208481/
> | fs/udf/balloc.c:274: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'generic_find_next_le_bit'

Yep, Jan's patch caused the build breakage.

Because generic_find_next_le_bit() is not available for all
archtectures. So we should use ext2_find_next_bit() here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux