On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:40:19 -0500 Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 14:23 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Fix gcc ISO C90 warning:
> >
> > fs/nfs/callback.c:356: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > fs/nfs/callback.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > --- linux-next-20091215.orig/fs/nfs/callback.c
> > +++ linux-next-20091215/fs/nfs/callback.c
> > @@ -352,8 +352,8 @@ static int check_gss_callback_principal(
> > static int nfs_callback_authenticate(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
> > {
> > struct nfs_client *clp;
> > - RPC_IFDEBUG(char buf[RPC_MAX_ADDRBUFLEN]);
> > int ret = SVC_OK;
> > + RPC_IFDEBUG(char buf[RPC_MAX_ADDRBUFLEN]);
> >
>
> What version of gcc is giving rise to this warning?
> gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 4.2.1 (SUSE Linux)
> RPC_IFDEBUG is a macro that either evaluates to its argument, or to
> nothing, depending on whether or not RPC_DEBUG is defined or not. In
> neither case should it evaluate to anything illegal under C90 rules
> afaics.
Yep. Odd warning.
---
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
