On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 03:05:28 pm Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Rusty,
>
> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:26:48 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c: In function 'powernowk8_target':
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c:1139: error: implicit declaration of function 'tsk_cpumask'
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c:1139: warning: passing argument 2 of 'cpumask_copy' makes pointer from integer without a cast
> > include/linux/cpumask.h:466: note: expected 'const struct cpumask *' but argument is of type 'int'
> >
> > Caused by commit 9dd4c5ab546fcac98cfb9ca24ed5cc1bf7f08334
> > ("cpumask:tsk_cpus_allowed-not-tsk_cpumask") from the rr tree interacting
> > with commit b8cbe7e82ec8b55d7bbdde66fc69e788fde00dc6 ("[CPUFREQ] cpumask:
> > don't put a cpumask on the stack in x86...cpufreq/powernow-k8.c") from
> > the cpufreq tree.
>
> The cpufreq patch above is now in Linus' tree, so You should add the
> patch below to your tree (or squash it into the affected patch).
Thanks, done and rebased.
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
