Hi Rusty,
Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c: In function 'powernowk8_target':
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c:1139: error: implicit declaration of function 'tsk_cpumask'
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c:1139: warning: passing argument 2 of 'cpumask_copy' makes pointer from integer without a cast
include/linux/cpumask.h:466: note: expected 'const struct cpumask *' but argument is of type 'int'
Caused by commit 9dd4c5ab546fcac98cfb9ca24ed5cc1bf7f08334
("cpumask:tsk_cpus_allowed-not-tsk_cpumask") from the rr tree interacting
with commit b8cbe7e82ec8b55d7bbdde66fc69e788fde00dc6 ("[CPUFREQ] cpumask:
don't put a cpumask on the stack in x86...cpufreq/powernow-k8.c") from
the cpufreq tree.
I have applied this merge fix up patch and can carry it as necessary:
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:21:00 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] rr: cpufreq: fix up for api name change
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c
index a9df944..f125e5c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c
@@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ static int powernowk8_target(struct cpufreq_policy *pol,
if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&oldmask, GFP_KERNEL))
return -ENOMEM;
- cpumask_copy(oldmask, tsk_cpumask(current));
+ cpumask_copy(oldmask, tsk_cpus_allowed(current));
set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(pol->cpu));
if (smp_processor_id() != pol->cpu) {
--
1.6.5.4
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
