* Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Please send all sched.c modifications via the scheduler tree. Going > > via other trees is fine when there's agreement by the maintainers - > > but this is one of the rare cases where that's not the case. > > Yeah, sure. So, two patchsets. One for sched/core doing pure > reorganization without any functional changes. The other for > sched/notifier (or whatever name you would prefer) which is purely for > development and testing and will not be pushed to Linus unless it > receives notifier framework cleanup. wq#for-next will pull from > sched/notifier and be exported to linux-next but it will never be > submitted to Linus until sched/notifier is cleaned up. Am I > understanding it correctly? Yeah, that would be fine. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
