* Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello, > > 11/27/2009 02:46 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Other code will benefit from it though, such as the page fault callbacks > > i already mentioned. > > > > My position on this is rather clear: i want no new callbacks and no > > changes to callbacks in the scheduler until this situation is cleaned > > up. Five callback sites are _way_ too much - so if you want to add > > callbacks or change them, please clean it up and improve it first. > > Even changes which cause no functional differences? [...] Such as enabling preempt notifiers unconditionally? That's a functional change - it turns a so-far optional callback into an essentially mandatory one. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
