On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 06:15:37AM -0600, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> > evaluation status to the platform") from the acpi tree and commit
> > b02d803d0fa3a395ba32bc5e5e3e7a3385ca7237 ("[CPUFREQ] Introduce bios_limit
> > per cpu cpufreq sysfs interface") from the cpufreq tree.
> First, thanks everybody for picking this up.
np, apologies for the delay.
> > By the way, Dave, Thomas, shouldn't the second version of
> > acpi_processor_get_bios_limit() in include/acpi/processor.h introduced by
> > the above cpufreq tree patch be "static inline"?
> Yes, good catch.
> Shall I send an on top fix somewhere?
Yeah, an incremental will be fine. I'll fold it into the original.
thanks,
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
