Hi Dave,
Today's linux-next merge of the cpufreq tree got a conflict in
include/acpi/processor.h between commit
d81c45e1c9369855901420f79114852eba2ea16a ("ACPI: Notify the _PPC
evaluation status to the platform") from the acpi tree and commit
b02d803d0fa3a395ba32bc5e5e3e7a3385ca7237 ("[CPUFREQ] Introduce bios_limit
per cpu cpufreq sysfs interface") from the cpufreq tree.
Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary.
By the way, Dave, Thomas, shouldn't the second version of
acpi_processor_get_bios_limit() in include/acpi/processor.h introduced by
the above cpufreq tree patch be "static inline"?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
diff --cc include/acpi/processor.h
index a920237,e7454b3..0000000
--- a/include/acpi/processor.h
+++ b/include/acpi/processor.h
@@@ -294,7 -294,8 +294,8 @@@ static inline void acpi_processor_ffh_c
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
void acpi_processor_ppc_init(void);
void acpi_processor_ppc_exit(void);
-int acpi_processor_ppc_has_changed(struct acpi_processor *pr);
+int acpi_processor_ppc_has_changed(struct acpi_processor *pr, int event_flag);
+ extern int acpi_processor_get_bios_limit(int cpu, unsigned int *limit);
#else
static inline void acpi_processor_ppc_init(void)
{
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
