* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus > > > (or ask him to fetch). It is allowed to be rebased if you > > > deem it necessary. > > > > The patches are tested on the pre-release platform that makes > > use of them. There have been several internal reviews and > > re-writes, but since we just got permission to release the > > patches last week, they've not been publically vetted yet. > > > > The content is quite close to what I plan to propose for > > upstream, but the format is not. I'll be re-factoring the > > series into "clean history" and senting them to LKML on Sunday > > night. > > > > I don't expect much comment on the generic part, but will want > > x86 maintainers to buy into the parts that touch their > > architecture. > > OK, then I think I need to hear from the x86 maintainers, at > least, before we include this. Yep, feel free, the SFI bits looked good in principle. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
