Hi Len, On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 14:27:59 -0400 (EDT) Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Is this 2.6.31 or 32 material? > > yes:-) > > Most that is in in sfi-test at this moment I hope to catch .31. > There will be much more in .32 -- mostly things that depend on > the first batch... OK, so then don't add any (more) .32 material into that branch until after Linus' releases 31-rc1, please. > > Should I put just you as the contact, or add the mailing list as well? > > The mailing list is fine (on cc), and I'm on that. > It is redundant to send to both. Then please ensure that I can post to that list (I don't want to subscribe obviously). > > Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him > > to fetch). It is allowed to be rebased if you deem it necessary. > > The patches are tested on the pre-release platform that > makes use of them. There have been several internal reviews > and re-writes, but since we just got permission to release the > patches last week, they've not been publically vetted yet. > > The content is quite close to what I plan to propose for upstream, > but the format is not. I'll be re-factoring the series into > "clean history" and senting them to LKML on Sunday night. > > I don't expect much comment on the generic part, > but will want x86 maintainers to buy into the > parts that touch their architecture. OK, then I think I need to hear from the x86 maintainers, at least, before we include this. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgphb8i2UmcaJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
