[PATCH v2] lockd: fix FILE_LOCKING=n build error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Trond Myklebust wrote:
> Until someone finds time to go through the code and add in all the
> CONFIG_FILE_LOCKING special cases, the above needs to be a 'depends on
> INET && FILE_LOCKING'.

That seems to work.  Thanks.




From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>

lockd without FILE_LOCKING doesn't make sense, so make LOCKD and
LOCKD_V4 depend on FILE_LOCKING, and make NFS depend on FILE_LOCKING.

Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/Kconfig     |    2 ++
 fs/nfs/Kconfig |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- linux-next-20090428.orig/fs/Kconfig
+++ linux-next-20090428/fs/Kconfig
@@ -226,10 +226,12 @@ source "fs/nfsd/Kconfig"
 
 config LOCKD
 	tristate
+	depends on FILE_LOCKING
 
 config LOCKD_V4
 	bool
 	depends on NFSD_V3 || NFS_V3
+	depends on FILE_LOCKING
 	default y
 
 config EXPORTFS
--- linux-next-20090428.orig/fs/nfs/Kconfig
+++ linux-next-20090428/fs/nfs/Kconfig
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 config NFS_FS
 	tristate "NFS client support"
-	depends on INET
+	depends on INET && FILE_LOCKING
 	select LOCKD
 	select SUNRPC
 	select NFS_ACL_SUPPORT if NFS_V3_ACL
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux