On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 08:22:50AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> > > lockd/svclock.c is missing a header file <linux/fs.h>. > > <linux/fs.h> is missing a definition of locks_release_private() > for the config case of FILE_LOCKING=n, causing a build error: > > fs/lockd/svclock.c:330: error: implicit declaration of function 'locks_release_private' LOCKD without FILE_LOCKING doesn't really make sense; would it be better to add a config dependency? --b. > > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/lockd/svclock.c | 1 + > include/linux/fs.h | 4 ++++ > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+) > > --- linux-next-20090428.orig/fs/lockd/svclock.c > +++ linux-next-20090428/fs/lockd/svclock.c > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ > > #include <linux/types.h> > #include <linux/errno.h> > +#include <linux/fs.h> > #include <linux/kernel.h> > #include <linux/sched.h> > #include <linux/smp_lock.h> > --- linux-next-20090428.orig/include/linux/fs.h > +++ linux-next-20090428/include/linux/fs.h > @@ -1183,6 +1183,10 @@ static inline void locks_remove_flock(st > return; > } > > +static inline void locks_release_private(struct file_lock *fl) > +{ > +} > + > static inline void posix_test_lock(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *fl) > { > return; > > -- > ~Randy > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html