On Monday 30 March 2009, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, Hi Stephen, > Changes since 20090327: > > Various conflicts have moved around due to some trees being merged into > Linus' tree. > > Linus' tree gained a build failure for which I applied a patch. > > The arm tree lost its three conflicts. > > The tracing tree inherited a build failure from the net tree. > > The genirq tree lost its conflict. > > The sched tree lost its conflict. > > The v4l-dvb tree lost its build failure. > > The acpi tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree but lost its build > failure. > > The ext4 tree lost its conflict. > > The net tree lost all its conflicts. > > The rr tree lost 8 conflicts. > > The slab tree lost all its conflicts. > > The drm tree lost its conflict. > > The lblnet tree lost its conflicts. > > The proc tree gained a build failure due to a new commit in Linus' tree - > I applied a patch. > > The suspend tree lost its conflict. For your information, I have created for-linus branch in the suspend tree. Currently, it is identical to the linux-next branch, but in future the Linus' tree will be periodically merged into the for-linus branch and the linux-next branch will be rebased on top of it. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
