Hi Jesse, On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:37:11 -0700 Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Looked liked it used the PCI MSI capability ID offset though? In that > case it would really want at least pci_regs.h, but pci.h seems a little > more complete in this case. The patch that broke the build added that usage ... and introduced the need for pci_regs.g to be included (or pci.h , as you say). -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgp73YpyWgjrB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
