On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:30:01 -0700
Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 02:41:17PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Jesse,
> >
> > On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:38:00 -0700 Jesse Barnes
> > <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:21:21 +1100
> > > Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 12:49:48 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> > > > <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed
> > > > > like this:
> > > > >
> > > > > arch/powerpc/kernel/msi.c: In function
> > > > > 'arch_msi_check_device': arch/powerpc/kernel/msi.c:23: error:
> > > > > 'PCI_CAP_ID_MSI' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > > > >
> > > > > Caused by commit 1c8d7b0a562da06d3ebe83f01b1ed553205d1ae4
> > > > > ("PCI MSI: Add support for multiple MSI"). PCI_CAP_ID_MSI is
> > > > > defined in linux/pci_regs.h which is included by linux/pci.h,
> > > > > but neither is included by arch/powerpc/kernel/msi.c.
> > > > >
> > > > > I have used the version of the pci tree from next-20090320 for
> > > > > today.
> > > >
> > > > This is still happening ...
>
> I just got back from a long weekend ...
>
> > > Does this fix it? Some header file changes must be to blame...
> >
> > Yeah, that patch fixes it, but so does just reverting the commit
> > above, so I guess that powerpc file did not need any of the pci.h
> > infrastructure before.
> >
> > Tested-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I guess not. I didn't compile-test it (I don't have a powerpc machine
> or cross-compiler). Seems odd, given that the whole purpose of the
> file is to implement PCI MSI ... oh well.
Ok fix pushed. Yeah it does seem weird. This file clearly uses PCI
defines...
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
