On Tue, 10 Mar 2009, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> crypto/zlib.c: In function 'zlib_compress_update':
> crypto/zlib.c:148: warning: initialization makes integer from pointer without a cast
> crypto/zlib.c:148: error: initializer element is not computable at load time
> crypto/zlib.c:148: error: (near initialization for 'descriptor.primary_hash')
> crypto/zlib.c:148: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
> crypto/zlib.c:148: warning: (near initialization for 'descriptor')
>
> And many more similar. This line is a pr_debug() statement, so the
> finger points at commit 25b67b75587d43ff3f09ad88c03c70a38372d95d
> ("dynamic debug: combine dprintk and dynamic printk") from the
> driver-core tree.
>
> The preprocessed code looks like this:
>
> static int zlib_compress_update(struct crypto_pcomp *tfm,
> struct comp_request *req)
> {
> int ret;
> struct zlib_ctx *dctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(crypto_pcomp_tfm(tfm));
> struct z_stream_s *stream = &dctx->comp_stream;
>
> do { do { static struct _ddebug descriptor __attribute__((__used__)) __attribute__((section("__verbose"), aligned(8))) = { "zlib", __func__, "/scratch/sfr/next/crypto/zlib.c", "%s: " "avail_in %u, avail_out %u\n", __func__, 55, 33, 148, 0 }; if (({ int __ret = 0; if (__builtin_expect(!!((dynamic_debug_enabled & (1LL << 55)) && (dynamic_debug_enabled2 & (1LL << 33))), 0)) if (__builtin_expect(!!(descriptor.flags), 0)) __ret = 1; __ret; })) printk("<7>" "zlib" ":" "%s: " "avail_in %u, avail_out %u\n", __func__, req->avail_in, req->avail_out); } while (0); } while (0);
>
> The problem is the line:
>
> #define pr_fmt(fmt) "%s: " fmt, __func__
>
> in crypto/zlib.c which was introduced by commit
> bf68e65ec9ea61e32ab71bef59aa5d24d255241f ("crypto: zlib - New zlib crypto
> module, using pcomp") from the crypto tree.
>
> For today, I have removed the above line from crypto/zlib.c, but
> something better needs to be done for tomorrow!
I had a closer look. It happens on all archs, if CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG=y.
crypto/zlib.c has:
#define pr_fmt(fmt) "%s: " fmt, __func__
If CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG is set, include/linux/kernel.h has:
#define pr_debug(fmt, ...) do { \
dynamic_pr_debug(pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__); \
} while (0)
include/linux/dynamic_debug.h has:
#define dynamic_pr_debug(fmt, ...) do { \
static struct _ddebug descriptor \
__used \
__attribute__((section("__verbose"), aligned(8))) = \
{ KBUILD_MODNAME, __func__, __FILE__, fmt, DEBUG_HASH, \
DEBUG_HASH2, __LINE__, _DPRINTK_FLAGS_DEFAULT }; \
if (__dynamic_dbg_enabled(descriptor)) \
printk(KERN_DEBUG KBUILD_MODNAME ":" fmt, \
##__VA_ARGS__); \
} while (0)
So in crypto/zlib.c,
| pr_debug("avail_in %u, avail_out %u\n", req->avail_in, req->avail_out);
is expanded to
| do {
| do {
| static struct _ddebug descriptor
| __attribute__((__used__))
| __attribute__((section("__verbose"), aligned(8))) = {
| "zlib",
| __func__,
| "crypto/zlib.c",
| "%s: " "avail_in %u, avail_out %u\n",
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This is the actual format string
| __func__,
^^^^^^^^^
But this is the first parameter, which should not be here!!!
| 55,
| 33,
| 150,
| 0
| };
| if (({
| int __ret = 0;
| if (__builtin_expect(!!((dynamic_debug_enabled & (1LL << 55)) &&
| (dynamic_debug_enabled2 & (1LL << 33))), 0))
| if (__builtin_expect(!!(descriptor.flags), 0))
| __ret = 1;
| __ret;
| }))
| printk("<7>" "zlib" ":" "%s: " "avail_in %u, avail_out %u\n", __func__,
| req->avail_in, req->avail_out);
| } while (0);
| } while (0);
Due the the superfluous `__func__', all field members are shifted by one
position, and compilation breaks.
Apparently inside dynamic_pr_debug(), `fmt' is:
"avail_in %u, avail_out %u\n", __func__
instead of only the part before the comma:
"avail_in %u, avail_out %u\n"
For the non-CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG case, pr_debug() is expanded correctly:
DEBUG is defined:
#define pr_debug(fmt, ...) \
printk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
and the line is expanded to:
| printk("<7>" "%s: " "avail_in %u, avail_out %u\n", __func__, req->avail_in, req->avail_out);
DEBUG is not defined:
#define pr_debug(fmt, ...) \
({ if (0) printk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__); 0; })
and the line is expanded to:
| ({ if (0) printk("<7>" "%s: " "avail_in %u, avail_out %u\n", __func__, req->avail_in, req->avail_out); 0; });
Why doesn't it work for dynamic_pr_debug()?
BTW, Martin: Is `#define pr_fmt(fmt) "%s: " fmt, __func__' a valid and
intended usage of your pr_fmt() infrastructure?
Thanks!
With kind regards,
Geert Uytterhoeven
Software Architect
Sony Techsoft Centre Europe
The Corporate Village · Da Vincilaan 7-D1 · B-1935 Zaventem · Belgium
Phone: +32 (0)2 700 8453
Fax: +32 (0)2 700 8622
E-mail: Geert.Uytterhoeven@xxxxxxxxxxx
Internet: http://www.sony-europe.com/
A division of Sony Europe (Belgium) N.V.
VAT BE 0413.825.160 · RPR Brussels
Fortis · BIC GEBABEBB · IBAN BE41293037680010
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
