David Miller wrote:
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:19:18 +0100
static int __init nf_conntrack_proto_dccp_init(void)
{
int err;
- err = nf_conntrack_l4proto_register(&dccp_proto4);
+ err = register_pernet_gen_device(&dccp_net_id, &dccp_net_ops);
Shouldn't it be register_pernet_gen_subsys ?
Do I really have to carefully and meticuliously scan down
hundreds and hundreds of irrelevant quoted patch text just
to see what bit you're commenting on?
Please, just provide the necessary context of the patch for
your comments, don't quote the whole thing :-(
Sorry, I will do that in the future.
-- Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
